Thinking Motives Codes Organization Report

Introduction

This report shows the degree of difference and correspondence between the organization members based on their preferences that result from their intellectual motives. It clearly shows the variation in achievements among different work teams and their members by accurately measuring the motives that influence their behavior (their impulsiveness or fears, their commitment to principles or how criticism and conflict affect them, their harmony or disagreement, their interest or indifference, and whether they work for enjoyment or simply to survive). It provides the organization with the appropriate motives for the work teams and their members, providing them with the distinctive tools to achieve a balance between the different motives. It sets a mechanism for investing and employing motives according to the context of the set goals to ensure the best performance.

TTMO report features:

• The total sum of the intellectual motives in the organization.
• Ranking work teams based on the sum of their intellectual motives.
• The organization's intellectual motives imprint.
• The organization's performance in the five intellectual motives.
• Traits of the organization members in each intellectual motive.
• The most prominent challenges the organization members face in each intellectual motive.
• The language the organization’s members use based on every intellectual motive.
• The most influential things on the organization members in every intellectual motive.
• Practical steps to develop or invest each intellectual motive.
• The names of the ten most powerful individuals in the sum of intellectual motives.
• The names of the ten least powerful individuals in the sum of intellectual motives.
• Recommendations
• Work plan
• Each team is given a Thinking Motives Codes Team Report (TA®) - TTMT, and is identified by the team grade in comparison to other organization teams' grades.
• Each organization member is given a Thinking Motives Codes Leader Report (TA®) - TTML, and is identified by their individual grade in comparison to the other members' scores on their team.